Home
Info on 1/4-Cent Tax
Recommendations
Watchdogs
News
Contact Us/Officers
Research/References

 

NEWS ABOUT CANT'S FIGHT AGAINST NEW TAXES

CANT WAGING VIGOROUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST PROPOSED NEW SCHOOL TAX

CANT has been been waging a vigorous campaign against the proposed property tax millage increase by the Jefferson Parish School Board to pay for a $200 million bond issue. The public vote on the tax has, however, been postponed until the beginning of next year.

CANT Chairman Margaret Baird and Vice-Chairman Margie Seemann, as well as other CANT members and supporters, have spoken against the tax at the School Board meetings on August 5th and September 2nd, as well as at the public hearing on the tax on August 25th.

CANT has taken exception to a statement in the Times-Picayune article which reported on the September 2nd School Board meeting, and Margie submitted the following as-yet-unpublished letter-to-the-editor:

Please don't trivialize CANT's anti-tax efforts

Re: "Board votes to delay tax proposal - Millage tentatively set for March ballot," Jenny Hurwitz, Thursday, September 3, 2009

I take offense to Ms. Jenny Hurwitz’s statement in the above Times-Picayune article with respect to the anti-tax speeches made by Citizens Against New Taxes (CANT) Chairman, Margaret Baird, and myself at the Jefferson Parish School Board Meeting this past Wednesday. In her article, the only thing she said about the speakers in opposition to the tax is the following derogatory statement: "A handful of residents spoke, including several who have appeared at nearly every meeting to protest the prospect of new taxes."

CANT members have spent a huge amount of time researching the proposed tax issue and are continuing to research this issue. We have obtained copies of School Board financial documents, including budgets and audits for the past few years, and Margaret, who is a retired CPA, has thoroughly analyzed these documents. Even now, we are awaiting a response to a Public Records Act request from the Jefferson School System.

Our research has also included printing and analyzing EVERY article in the Times-Picayune archives about the School Board for the last five years, as well as Google searches for information. We resent the implication that there is no substance to our opposition to the tax.

Ms. Hurwitz, please do not trivialize our anti-tax effort—I doubt that any of the other speakers at the School Board meeting have spent as much time as we have researching the School System tax issue.

Margie Seemann

Vice-Chairman, Citizens Against New Taxes (CANT)

_____________________________________________________________________

CANT ON THE RADIO OPPOSING THE SCHOOL TAX

CANT Chairman Margaret Baird and Vice-Chairman Margie Seemann were on the radio (WGSO 990 a.m.) this past Tuesday, September 1st. They were interviewed by John Roberts for 45 minutes, mostly about their reasons for opposing the proposed Jefferson Parish School System’s property tax millage to pay for a $200 million bond issue, although at the end of the interview he let them talk about their proposed legislation for the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office.

The two state laws they are promoting are:

  1. A state law to cover employees of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office (JPSO) under a merit-based civil service system in which JPSO employees would be promoted based on education and job performance.
  2. A state law to require approval of JPSO budgets and the financial dealings of the JPSO by an oversight group, such as the Jefferson Parish Council.

They also mentioned that they were going to Washington, D.C. on September 12th for the "March on Washington" to oppose President Obama’s healthcare plan. Roberts asked them to call in to his show when they get back to give a report on the event.

_____________________________________________________________________

CANT MENTIONED IN T-P ARTICLE ABOUT PROPOSED SCHOOL TAX

CANT was mentioned in the Times-Picayune article, "Roussel to draw list of school projects - Property tax would pay for construction," published on August 7th. This article provides some of the remarks made by CANT officers at the Jefferson School Board meeting on August 5th against the proposed $200 million bond issue. The following is a quote from this article:

"Before voting, the board heard from sisters Margaret Baird and Margie Seemann of Citizens Against New Taxes. Instead of building new schools, they said, the board should remodel schools that are older but still viable.

"We don't need and don't want extravagant, state-of-the arts schools," Seemann said. "We're in the midst of a serious recession, and raising taxes at this time is unthinkable."

"Baird said she was "astonished" that the board is even considering such a referendum. She said it would be better off selling underused schools and using the proceeds to renovate older schools.

By the way, we do want modern, up-to-date schools for the Jefferson School System, but we want to accomplish this by remodeling and technology-updating existing schools, not building new ones.

_____________________________________________________________________

CANT IN THE NEWS AT DAVID VITTER’S TOWN HALL MEETING

CANT officers Margie Seemann and Margaret Baird and others participated in the anti-Obamacare activities outside of the Yenni Building at Sen. David Vitter’s Townhall Meeting on August 10th. Margie had her photo on the front page of the Times-Picayune on August 11th distributing our homemade anti-Obama healthcare signs for others to hold. The signs said such things as "STOP OBAMACARE," "NO GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTHCARE," "KEEP GOVERNMENT OUT OF OUR HEALTHCARE," "VOTE NO ON OBAMA HEALTHCARE PLAN," etc.

_____________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO STATE LAWS FOR JPSO

We have formed a companion organization to Citizens Against New Taxes (CANT) called Citizens for Good Government (CFGG). While CANT is a tax-fighting group, the purpose of Citizens for Good Government is to identify fraud, waste, and corruption in government and to promote legislation to correct these evils. Since our research has identified numerous problems with recent actions taken by the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office (JPSO), we have prepared the draft document, "RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO STATE LAWS FOR THE JPSO," a summary of which is included below. This document presents our justification for enacting two new state laws which apply to the JPSO.

We are currently contacting and meeting with legislators to request that they introduce and/or support the legislation which we have recommended when the Louisiana Legislature meets next year. We intend to lobby all of the legislators in the state to support this legislation, which we believe will go a long way toward correcting the problems which we have identified with the JPSO.

Citizens for Good Government does want everyone to know that we believe that Sheriff Newell Normand is doing a good job in keeping crime down and keeping our community safe. Our problem with the Sheriff is with some of his personnel and financial policies—we feel that some of his personnel policies are unfair to his employees and we don’t believe that he has managed the finances of the Sheriff’s Office in a fiscally responsible manner.

Summary of recommended changes to state laws by Citizens for Good Government (August 30, 2009)

Because we disagree with a number of actions taken by the Jefferson Parish Sheriff and believe that they are legal, but absolutely wrong and unacceptable, Citizens for Good Government believes that it will be necessary to pass two state laws to correct these actions.

  1. Citizens for Good Government recommends a state law to cover employees of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office (JPSO) under a merit-based civil service system in which JPSO employees would be promoted based on education and job performance.

    This law is necessary to protect the employees of the JPSO who serve at the pleasure of the Sheriff. They should not have to worry about "being hired and fired at will," as articulated by the late Sheriff Harry Lee. They should also not be subject to political pressure by which JPSO employees feel that they must support and work for political candidates supported by the Sheriff, since they serve at the pleasure of the Sheriff. And JPSO employees should be assured that they will be promoted based on their education and job performance. Our recommended civil service system would be similar to the merit-based civil service system recently implemented by the city of Kenner.

  2. Citizens for Good Government recommends a state law to require approval of JPSO budgets and the financial dealings of the JPSO by an oversight group, such as the Jefferson Parish Council.

This law is necessary because the Sheriff alone currently has the authority to make all decisions with respect to the finances of the JPSO, without any checks or balances on his decisions. He approves the budget without any oversight. The Sheriff can and has borrowed money in tax revenue bonds without even informing taxpayers that he was going to do this. Case in point is when he borrowed $30 million in tax revenue bonds on August 1, 2008 without letting taxpayers know about it.

The Sheriff also said he was going to spend the proceeds of this $30 million loan on the crime lab, the Bonnabel boat launch, etc., even though he had previously set aside funds for these projects out of his huge Katrina surplus. If the Jefferson Parish Council or some other oversight group were monitoring the finances of the JPSO, it is unlikely that the Sheriff would have been permitted to make this unnecessary loan, and the taxpayers of Jefferson Parish would have been spared the $2.3 million annual payments which the JPSO will continue making for the next 19 years.

In addition, if an oversight group were monitoring the finances of the JPSO, they might object to the large number of unmarked take-home vehicles provided to individuals by the JPSO. Based on data as of 3/24/09, JPSO provided 494 UNMARKED take-home vehicles to individuals, including 3 secretaries, 16 part-time employees, and 36 reserve officers, who are not even employees. These unmarked take-home vehicles included 74 SUVs.

Citizens for Good Government also believes that an oversight group might also look into what may be excessive charges on FUELMAN credit cards, which are provided to individuals to purchase fuel for the JPSO’s extensive fleet of vehicles. Our group obtained FUELMAN reports containing all of the fuel charges for two weeks (the first week of June, 2008 and the first week of June, 2009). In these reports, a significant number of charges were flagged as questionable by FUELMAN. In addition, our group identified a significant number of questionable charges because of such things as unusually low miles per gallon. However, the JPSO reported to us that "We don’t track the data internally, we rely on Fuelman’s system." If there were some oversight of JPSO finances, the FUELMAN discrepancies which we have identified would surely be looked into.

_____________________________________________________________________

CANT HAS LETTER-TO-THE-EDITOR PUBISHED ABOUT SCHOOL TAX

CANT Chairman Margaret Baird had the following letter-to-the-editor published, giving some of our arguments against the proposed Jefferson Parish School System’s property tax millage increase:


Jeff schools need cuts, not taxes
Saturday, August 08, 2009

Re: "Jefferson Parish school tax plan moves forward," Metro, July 29.

Hasn't the Jefferson Parish Public School System heard that we are in the midst of a serious recession, and the last thing the school system should do at this time is to raise taxes?

And didn't the school system already raise our property taxes enough when it rolled forward the property tax millage rate last September?

Didn't it already obtain $50 million in bond money in 2008? And now it wants another $200 million for additional Taj Mahal school buildings? This is for a school system that had a declining enrollment even before Katrina.

Now the school system complains that it lost 8,000 students, and so it is losing Minimum Foundation Program money. But doesn't this loss of students mean that we need fewer teachers, fewer administrators and fewer schools?

We should be talking about closing and consolidating schools, selling the shuttered properties and using this money for new construction.

The school system should forget about this huge, unjustified tax increase and concentrate on wisely spending the funds very generously provided by the taxpayers of Jefferson.

Margaret Baird
Chairman, Citizens Against New Taxes

_____________________________________________________________________

ANOTHER UNPUBLISHED CANT ANTI-TAX LETTER-TO-THE EDITOR

The following anti-tax letter-to-the-editor was submitted to the Times-Picayune, but it was not selected for publication. It was in response to an article about the Sheriff postponing the vote on his ¼-cent sales tax increase until next year.

A Wise Decision

Re: Push to raise Jeff sales tax stalls, August 06, 2009

We believe that the decision to postpone the ¼-cent sales tax increase primarily for the benefit of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office (JPSO) was a wise one, although we would have preferred that they cancel these plans altogether.

This tax increase was primarily intended to raise law enforcement salaries. We are, however, pleased that on July 1st the deputies received a $900 per year raise in State Supplemental Pay, so that the salary for Jefferson Parish deputies after one year on the job is now up to $39,480.

The article also indicates that the Jefferson School Board is considering a proposal for a property tax increase to finance $200 million in bonds for new construction. An important reason why we are opposing this bond issue is the long-time declining enrollment in Jefferson schools, which has resulted in a significant overcapacity in school facilities. It would be far more cost effective to close unneeded schools, consolidate underutilized schools, and to remodel and technology-update the viable older schools, where required, without raising taxes.

By the way, one of the reasons that so many property owners in Jefferson had huge property tax increases is that both the JPSO and the Jefferson School Board voted to roll forward the property tax millage rate this past year. We think the residents of Jefferson Parish are taxed enough.

Margie Seemann

Vice-Chairman, Citizens Against New Taxes

CANT WAS IN THE NEWS AGAIN, PARTICIPATING IN JPSO BUDGET MEETING

CANT was in the news again, as indicated in the Times-Picayune article published on June 26th, which I have included  below.  CANT was represented at the public hearing at which the JPSO Amended (Final) Budgets for 08-09, and the Proposed Budgets for 09-10 were approved.  I offered a number of comments, and there were some testy exchanges between myself and CFO Paul Rivera.

We are still upset about the $30 million loan quietly made by JPSO on August 1, 2008, which they said was for capital projects that they had already funded from their huge Katrina surplus. The taxpayers of Jefferson have already started repaying this loan with interest, and for the next 19 years we will be paying approximately $2.3 million a year to service this unnecessary loan.

_____________________________________________________________________

CANT HAS LETTER-TO-THE-EDITOR PUBLISHED ON JPSO BUDGET

On June 20th CANT again had a letter-to-the-editor published in the Times-Picayune, which I have pasted below. Since CANT is a taxpayer watchdog group, we felt that it was important to make Jefferson taxpayers aware of some of the issues we have with the Sheriff, prior to the budget meeting on June 25th, at which CFO Paul Rivera presented the 2009-10 JPSO Proposed Budgets, as well as the 2008-09 Final Budgets.

As we have said in the past, CANT believes that the Sheriff is doing a good job in fighting crime in Jefferson and keeping our neighborhoods safe. However, because of our research, we believe that he has NOT been managing our taxpayer dollars in a fiscally responsible way.

We have obtained a large number of JPSO financial documents through Public Records Act requests, and CANT Chairman and retired CPA Margaret Baird has thoroughly analyzed these documents. As a result, we have compiled much important information with regard to the finances of JPSO, in addition to the information included in our letter-to-the-editor. As taxpayer watchdogs, we will continue to monitor the finances of the JPSO.

Published letter-to-the-editor:

Jefferson Parish sheriff's budget needs clarity, Saturday, June 20, 2009

Re: "Spending outpaces revenue in Jeff budget," Metro, June 12.

We hope that this year's Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office budget, to be presented June 26, more accurately reflects the true finances and intentions of JPSO than last year's budget did.

The 2008-09 proposed budget did not mention the intention of JPSO to borrow $30 million in tax revenue bonds on Aug. 1, 2008, even though the Louisiana Bond Commission had given final approval six days before the budget meeting for the sheriff to issue these bonds.

To make matters worse, the sheriff later said he was going to use this loan money for the crime lab and some other projects, even though he had previously funded these projects out of his huge Katrina surplus.

Another issue of concern is the inaccuracy in the revised (final) budget for 2007-08. One significant inaccuracy was that the revised budget projected the General Fund surplus on June 30, 2008, to be only $22 million, while the actual General Fund surplus on that date from the 2007-08 audit was $28,447,317. These inaccuracies caused significant errors in the 2008-09 budget.

We believe that the taxpayers of Jefferson Parish have a right to expect more accuracy in the budget numbers presented by the sheriff's office and to expect the office to be honest in letting taxpayers know their intentions.

Margie Seemann, Vice-Chairman, Citizens Against New Taxes

CANT Officers on WLAE-TV (COX Channel 14) on Friday, February 13th at 7:30 PM and again on Sunday, February 15th at 10:00 PM

Jeff Crouere, host of the WLAE-TV (Cox Channel 14) show "Ringside: Politics with a Punch," interviewed CANT Chairman Margaret Baird and Vice-Chairman Margie Seemann on February 11th for his TV show. The 15-minute interview was seen on WLAE-TV on Friday, February 13th at 7:30 PM and again on Sunday, February 15th at 10:00 PM. Among the topics discussed by the CANT officers were the reasons they oppose the ¼-cent tax increase for the Sheriff and some of the problems they have with the finances of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office.

Margaret repeated her charge that the Sheriff borrowed $30 million in tax revenue bonds on August 1st, 2008 without any publicity and that the reasons he gave for borrowing this money was for the crime lab and other projects for which he had already set aside funds from his Katrina surplus.  Hence the bonds were not needed, and the $2.3 million per year needed to service the bonds could be better spend on salaries and new hires.

CANT Met with Sheriff Newell Normand on Friday, January 16th

On Friday, January 16th Citizens Against New Taxes chairman, Margaret Baird, and vice-chairman, Margie Seemann, met with Sheriff Newell Normand and three of his associates for over two hours at the headquarters in Marrero. The meeting was cordial, although at times slightly heated, as we discussed a number of issues regarding the ¼ % sales tax and finances of the Sheriff’s office. No minds were changed.

We believe that the Sheriff and his deputies do an outstanding job in keeping us safe. We are very happy that our deputies have already received a number of pay increases. In January 2005 they received a 5% raise; in April 2006 they received a raise of between 5% and 25%; and in October 2006 they received another 5% to 25% raise, in addition to longevity increases and advancement raises. Also in July 2008 their state supplemental pay increased by $1500 per year. There appears to have been a bidding war among the law enforcement agencies in this area, so some others have recently increased their salaries also. But we believe that the current salaries and benefits of the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office are generally competitive with the surrounding area.

This is the wrong time to raise taxes. The economy is in the tank; many homeowners have experienced large increases in their property taxes; and the Sheriff will be receiving as much as $5 million in additional revenue because he rolled forward the property tax millage without a vote of the people.

At the meeting, we indicated that we are upset at the fact that the Sheriff borrowed $30 million in the form of a limited tax revenue bond in August 2008 (which he has a right to do). If this were a general obligation bond, a vote of the people would have been required. Because it was a revenue bond, no vote was required. We feel strongly that, if there had been a vote, it would have failed. We are also upset that he is using a big chunk of the roll forward money to pay for this bond. We believe that the roll forward money should be used for salaries and new hires. Since Katrina, huge amounts have already been spent or earmarked for capital projects. This $30 million bond was a bad idea.

The audit for 2007-2008 is almost complete. After we obtain a copy and study its contents, we’ll have more to say.